Skip to content
VERILO

Microsoft Teams vs Otter.ai

A side-by-side look at Microsoft Teams and Otter.ai: what each costs to start, whether there is a free plan, how easy they are to pick up, and which features and integrations they cover.

Which should you choose?

Choose Microsoft Teams if

  • Organisations already paying for Microsoft 365
  • Teams that want chat, meetings and files under one licence and one administrator
  • Companies that need guest and external-user collaboration inside the same tool

Choose Otter.ai if

  • Individuals who want automatic notes for back-to-back video calls
  • Students and journalists recording lectures and interviews
  • Sales and customer teams that need call summaries in the CRM

Cheapest to start

Not confirmed

Free plan

Microsoft Teams, Otter.ai

Highest editor rating

Microsoft Teams · 4.1

Comparison of Microsoft Teams and Otter.ai
CompareMicrosoft Teams
Free planYes
Free trialNo
Starting priceFrom $4/mo
Editor rating4.1
Ease of useModerate (3/5)
CategoryCommunication
Pricing modelMicrosoft Teams Free is available at no cost. Teams Essentials, the standalone small-business plan, is listed at $4.00 per user per month paid yearly, and Microsoft 365 plans that include Teams start around $7.00 per user per month paid yearly for Business Basic. Microsoft sells its Business and Enterprise suites in separate versions with and without Teams. List prices for annual billing; they vary by region and billing term.
Plans
  • Microsoft Teams Free Free
  • Microsoft Teams Essentials $4/user/mo
  • Microsoft 365 Business Basic (with Teams) $7/user/mo
  • Microsoft Teams Enterprise (standalone) Custom
PlatformsWeb, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, API
IntegrationsMicrosoft 365, Outlook
Best for
  • Organisations already paying for Microsoft 365
  • Teams that want chat, meetings and files under one licence and one administrator
  • Companies that need guest and external-user collaboration inside the same tool
Pros
  • Deeply integrated with Microsoft 365: a new team also creates a SharePoint site, an Exchange mailbox and a OneNote notebook
  • Chat, meetings, webinars, town halls and VoIP calling in one product
  • Standard, private and shared channels, so external collaboration does not need a separate tool
  • Guests and external users can join meetings without their own licence
  • Third-party app platform and a documented development platform
Cons
  • Most of its value depends on already paying for Microsoft 365
  • Since April 2024 Microsoft sells suites with and without Teams, so the plan you expect may not include it
  • Telephony requires a separate Teams Phone add-on and a PSTN connection
  • Heavier and slower to learn than a chat-only tool
AI agentsNo
AI assistantNo
API accessYes
Browser extensionNo
Channels & threadsYes
Comments & mentionsNo
Desktop appYes
Guest & client accessYes
Import & exportNo
Meeting recording & transcriptsYes
Mobile appYes
Multi-language supportNo
Real-time collaborationYes
Roles & permissionsYes
Screen sharingYes
SSO / SAMLYes
TranscriptionNo
Video callsYes
WebinarsYes

Common questions

Does Microsoft Teams or Otter.ai have a free plan?
Both do. Microsoft Teams and Otter.ai each offer a free tier, so you can try either without paying.
Which is easier to use, Microsoft Teams or Otter.ai?
In VERILO's editorial assessment Otter.ai is the easier of the two, scoring 5 out of 5 against 3 for Microsoft Teams. That is a judgement about how quickly a new team gets productive, not a measured benchmark.

Go deeper

Browse wider

Search VERILO

Search software, categories and guides